Antonín Leopold Dvořák ( d(ə)-VOR-zha(h)k; Czech: [ˈantoɲiːn ˈlɛopolt ˈdvor̝aːk]; 8 September 1841 – 1 May 1904) was a Czech composer. After Bedřich Smetana, he was the next Czech Romantic-era composer to achieve worldwide recognition. Following Smetana’s nationalist example, Dvořák frequently employed aspects, specifically rhythms, of the folk music of Moravia and his native Bohemia. Dvořák’s own style has been described as “the fullest recreation of a national idiom with that of the symphonic tradition, absorbing folk influences and finding effective ways of using them”.
Dvořák displayed his musical gifts at an early age, being an apt violin student from age six. The first public performances of his works were in Prague in 1872 and, with special success, in 1873, when he was aged 31. Seeking recognition beyond the Prague area, he submitted a score of his First Symphony to a prize competition in Germany, but did not win, and the unreturned manuscript was lost until rediscovered many decades later. In 1874 he made a submission to the Austrian State Prize for Composition, including scores of two further symphonies and other works. Although Dvořák was not aware of it, Johannes Brahms was the leading member of the jury and was highly impressed. The prize was awarded to Dvořák in 1874 and again in 1876 and in 1877, when Brahms and the prominent critic Eduard Hanslick, also a member of the jury, made themselves known to him. Brahms recommended Dvořák to his publisher, Simrock, who soon afterward commissioned what became the Slavonic Dances, Op. 46. These were highly praised by the Berlin music critic Louis Ehlert in 1878, the sheet music (of the original piano 4-hands version) had excellent sales, and Dvořák’s international reputation was launched at last.
Dvořák’s first piece of a religious nature, his setting of Stabat Mater, was premiered in Prague in 1880. It was very successfully performed in London in 1883, leading to many other performances in the United Kingdom and United States. In his career, Dvořák made nine invited visits to England, often conducting performances of his own works. His Seventh Symphony was written for London. Visiting Russia in March 1890, he conducted concerts of his own music in Moscow and Saint Petersburg. In 1891 Dvořák was appointed as a professor at the Prague Conservatory. In 1890–91, he wrote his Dumky Trio, one of his most successful chamber music pieces. In 1892, Dvořák moved to the United States and became the director of the National Conservatory of Music of America in New York City. While in the United States, Dvořák wrote his two most successful orchestral works: the Symphony From the New World, which spread his reputation worldwide, and his Cello Concerto, one of the most highly regarded of all cello concerti. He also wrote his most appreciated piece of chamber music, the American String Quartet, during this time. But shortfalls in payment of his salary, along with increasing recognition in Europe and an onset of homesickness, led him to leave the United States and return to Bohemia in 1895.
All of Dvořák’s nine operas but his first have librettos in Czech and were intended to convey Czech national spirit, as were some of his choral works. By far the most successful of the operas is Rusalka. Among his smaller works, the seventh Humoresque and the song “Songs My Mother Taught Me” are also widely performed and recorded. He has been described as “arguably the most versatile… composer of his time”.
Dvořák was born in Nelahozeves near Prague, in the Austrian Empire, and was the eldest son of František Dvořák (1814–94) and his wife, Anna, née Zdeňková (1820–82). František worked as an innkeeper, a professional player of the zither, and a butcher. Anna was the daughter of Josef Zdeněk, the bailiff of the Prince of Lobkowicz. Anna and František married on 17 November 1840. Dvořák was the first of fourteen children, eight of whom survived infancy. Dvořák was baptized as a Roman Catholic in the village’s church of St. Andrew. Dvořák’s years in Nelahozeves nurtured his strong Christian faith and the love for his Bohemian heritage that so strongly influenced his music. In 1847, Dvořák entered primary school and was taught to play violin by his teacher Joseph Spitz. He showed early talent and skill, playing in a village band and in church. František was pleased with his son’s gifts. At the age of 13, through the influence of his father, Dvořák was sent to Zlonice to live with his uncle Antonín Zdenĕk in order to learn the German language. His first composition, the Forget-Me-Not Polka in C (Polka pomněnka) was written possibly as early as 1855.
Dvořák took organ, piano, and violin lessons from his German-language teacher Anton Liehmann. Liehmann also taught the young boy music theory and introduced him to the composers of the time; Dvořák had much regard for Liehmann despite his teacher’s violent temper. Liehmann was the church organist in Zlonice and sometimes let Antonín play the organ at services. Dvořák took further organ and music theory lessons at Česká Kamenice with Franz Hanke, who encouraged his musical talents even further and was more sympathetic. At the age of 16, through the urging of Liehmann and Zdenĕk, František allowed his son to become a musician, on the condition that the boy should work toward a career as an organist. After leaving for Prague in September 1857, Dvořák entered the city’s Organ School, studying singing with Josef Zvonař, theory with František Blažek, and organ with Joseph Foerster. The latter was not only a professor at the Prague Conservatory, but also a composer for the organ; his son Josef Bohuslav Foerster became a better known composer. Dvořák also took an additional language course to improve his German and worked as an “extra” violist in numerous bands and orchestras, including the orchestra of the St. Cecilia Society. Dvořák graduated from the Organ School in 1859, ranking second in his class. He applied unsuccessfully for a position as an organist at St. Henry’s Church, but remained undaunted in pursuing a musical career.
In 1858, he joined Karel Komzák’s orchestra, with whom he performed in Prague’s restaurants and at balls. The high professional level of the ensemble attracted the attention of Jan Nepomuk Maýr, who engaged the whole orchestra in the Bohemian Provisional Theater Orchestra. Dvořák played viola in the orchestra beginning in 1862. Dvořák could hardly afford concert tickets, and playing in the orchestra gave him a chance to hear music, mainly operas. In July 1863, Dvořák played in a program devoted to the German composer Richard Wagner, who conducted the orchestra. Dvořák had had “unbounded admiration” for Wagner since 1857. In 1862, Dvořák had begun composing his first string quartet. In 1864, Dvořák agreed to share the rent of a flat located in Prague’s Žižkov district with five other people, who also included violinist Mořic Anger and Karel Čech, who later became a singer. In 1866, Maýr was replaced as chief conductor by Bedřich Smetana. Dvořák was making about $7.50 a month. The constant need to supplement his income pushed him to give piano lessons. It was through these piano lessons that he met his future wife. He originally fell in love with his pupil and colleague from the Provisional Theater, Josefína Čermáková, for whom he apparently composed the song-cycle “Cypress Trees”. However, she never returned his love and ended up marrying another man. In 1873 Dvořák married Josefina’s younger sister, Anna Čermáková (1854–1931). They had nine children together, three of whom died in infancy.
Dvořák called his String Quintet in A Minor (1861) his Opus 1, and his First String Quartet (1862) his Opus 2, although the chronological Burghauser Catalogue numbers these as B.6 and B.7, showing five earlier compositions without opus numbers. In the early 1860s, Dvořák also made his first symphonic attempts, some of which he self-critically burned. The manuscript of a symphony in C minor without opus number, B.9, composed in 1865, was preserved. This symphony has come to be numbered as Dvořák’s First (see under “Works”). His first composing attempts passed without critical reception or public performances. His compositions up through 1870, according to the Burghauser Catalogue either had no known premieres, or were premiered in 1888 or later. For example, the Third String Quartet, B.18, was written in about 1869 but first published in 1964 and premiered in 1969. In 1870, he composed his first opera, Alfred, over the course of five months from May to October. Its overture was first publicly performed as late as 1905, and the full opera only in 1938.
In 1871 Dvořák left the Provisional Theatre orchestra in order to have more time for composing. Up through 1871 Dvořák only gave opus numbers up to 5 among his first 26 compositions. The first press mention of Antonín Dvořák appeared in the Hudební listy journal in June 1871, and the first publicly performed composition was the song Vzpomínání (“Reminiscence”, October 1871, musical evenings of L. Procházka). The opera The King and the Charcoal Burner was returned to Dvořák from the Provisional Theatre and said to be unperformable. Its overture was premiered in 1872 in a Philharmonic concert conducted by Bedřich Smetana, but the full opera with the original score only in 1929. Clapham says Dvořák realized he had gone to “extremes in attempting to follow the example of Wagner”. In 1873–74 he reset “the King and Charcoal Burner libretto entirely afresh, in a totally different manner”, without using “anything from the ill-fated earlier version”. The alternate opera, called King and Charcoal Burner II, B.42, was premiered in Prague in 1874.
On leaving the National Theater Orchestra after his marriage, Dvořák secured the job of organist at St. Vojtěch, also called St. Adalbert’s, Church in Prague under Josef Foerster, his former teacher at the Organ School. The job paid “a mere pittance”, but it was “a welcome addition for the young couple”. Despite these circumstances, Dvořák still managed to compose a substantial body of music around this time.
In November 1872, Dvořák’s Piano Quintet in A major, Op. 5, was performed in Prague, by a “splendid team of players” organized by Procházka. It was his first piece played in a concert. In March 1873, his Czech patriotic cantata The Heirs of the White Mountain was performed by the Prague Hlahol Choral Society of 300 singers (conducted by his friend and supporter Karel Bendl) to a warm response from both audience and critics, making it an “unqualified success”. Dvořák’s compositions were first coming to be recognized in Prague.
When Dvořák turned age 33 in 1874, however, he remained almost unknown as a composer outside the area of Prague. That year, he applied for and won the Austrian State Prize (“Stipendium”) for composition, awarded in February 1875 by a jury consisting of the critic Eduard Hanslick, Johann Herbeck, director of the State Opera, and Johannes Brahms. It seems that Brahms had only recently joined the jury, as he was not on it during the calendar year of 1874, according to Hanslick. Hanslick had first-hand knowledge, as a continuing member of the jury (from at least 1874 to1877). Nevertheless, Brahms had time and opportunity to appreciate Dvořák’s 1874 submission. Botstein says that the jury’s purpose was “to award financial support to talented composers in need” in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The jury received a “massive submission” from Dvořák: “fifteen works including two symphonies, several overtures and a song cycle”. Brahms was “visibly overcome” by the “mastery and talent” of Dvořák. The two symphonies were Dvořák’s third and fourth, both of which had been premiered in Prague in the spring of 1874.
Clapham gives the official report for the 1874 prize, saying Dvořák was a relatively impoverished music teacher who “has submitted 15 compositions, among them symphonies, which display an undoubted talent…The applicant… deserves a grant to ease his straitened circumstances and free him from anxiety in his creative work.” It says he had not yet owned a piano. Before being married, he had lodged with five other men, one of whom owned a small “spinet” piano.
In 1875, the year his first son was born, Dvořák composed his second string quintet, his 5th Symphony, Piano Trio No. 1, and Serenade for Strings in E. He again entered but this time did not win the Austrian State Prize. He did win it in 1876, and finally felt free to resign his position as an organist. In 1877 he wrote the “Symphonic Variations” and Ludevít Procházka conducted its premiere in Prague.
Dvořák entered the Austrian Prize competition again in 1877, submitting his Moravian Duets and other music, possibly his Piano Concerto. He did not learn the outcome until December. Then, he received a personal letter from the music critic Eduard Hanslick, who had also been on the juries awarding the prizes. The letter not only notified Dvořák that he had again won the prize, but made known to him for the first time that Brahms and Hanslick had been on the jury. The letter conveyed an offer of friendly assistance of the two in making Dvořák’s music known outside his Czech motherland. Within the month December 1877, Dvořák wrote his String Quartet No. 9 in D minor and dedicated it to Brahms. Both Brahms and Hanslick had been much impressed by the Moravian Duets, and Brahms recommended them to his publisher, Simrock, who published them with success. Having in mind Brahms’s well-received Hungarian Dances, Simrock commissioned Dvořák to write something of the same nature. Dvořák submitted his Slavonic Dances, Op. 46 in 1878, at first for piano four hands, but when requested by Simrock, also in an orchestral version. These were an immediate and great success. On 15 December 1878, the leading music critic Louis Ehlert published a review of the Moravian Duets and Slavonic Dances in the Berlin “Nationalzeitung”, saying that the “Dances” would make their way “round the world” and “a heavenly naturalness flows through this music”. “There was a run on the German music shops for the dances and duets of this hitherto… unknown composer.” The dances were played in 1879 in concerts in France, England, and the United States. Later Simrock requested further Slavonic Dances, which Dvořák supplied in his Op. 72, 1886.
In 1879 Dvořák wrote his String Sextet. Simrock showed the score to the leading violinist Joseph Joachim, who with others premiered it in November of that year. Joachim became a “chief champion” of Dvořák’s chamber music. In that same year, Dvořák also wrote his Violin Concerto. In December he dedicated the piece to Joachim and sent him the score. The next spring the two discussed the score and Dvořák revised it extensively, but Joachim was still not comfortable with it. The concerto was premiered in Prague in October 1883 by the violinist František Ondříček, who also played it in Vienna with conductor Hans Richter in December of that year. Twice later, Joachim was scheduled to play the concerto, but both times the arrangements fell through and he never did play it.
Hans Richter asked Dvořák to compose his Symphony No. 6 for the Vienna Philharmonic, intending to premiere it in December 1880. However, Dvořák later discovered that, despite this intention, members of the orchestra objected to performing works by the composer in two consecutive seasons, due to “anti-Czech feeling”. Adolf Čech therefore conducted the premiere of the symphony at a concert of the Philharmonia society (in Czech: spolek Filharmonie, predecessor of the Czech Philharmonic) on 25 March 1881, in Prague. Richter did eventually conduct the piece in London in 1882 and always retained an interest in Dvořák’s compositions.
Dvořák’s Stabat Mater (1880) was performed and very well received at the Royal Albert Hall in London on 10 March 1883, conducted by Joseph Barnby. The success “sparked off a whole series of performances in England and the United States”, a year ahead of appreciation in Germany and Austria. Dvořák was invited to visit Britain where he appeared to great acclaim in 1884. The London Philharmonic Society commissioned Dvořák to conduct concerts in London, and his performances were well received there. In response to the commission, Dvořák wrote his Symphony No. 7 and conducted its premiere at St. James’s Hall on 22 April 1885. On a visit later in 1885, Dvořák presented his cantata The Spectre’s Bride, in a concert on 27 August. He had arrived a week early to conduct rehearsals of the chorus of 500 voices and orchestra of 150. The performance was “a greater triumph than any” Dvořák “had had in his life up to that time…following this phenomenal success, choral societies in the English-speaking countries hastened to prepare and present the new work.” Dvořák visited Britain at least eight times in total, conducting his own works there. In 1887, Richter conducted the Symphonic Variations in London and Vienna to great acclaim (they had been written ten years earlier and Dvořák had allowed them to languish after initial lack of interest from his publishers). Richter wrote to Dvořák of the London performance, “at the hundreds of concerts I have conducted during my life, no new work has been as successful as yours.”
Despite Dvořák’s newfound success, a February 1888 performance of Stabat Mater in Vienna fell victim to more anti-Czech feeling and what the composer called “destructive criticism”. He heartily thanked Richter for his “courage and devoted sympathy”. In 1890, influenced by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, Dvořák also visited Russia, and conducted performances of his music in Moscow and St. Petersburg. In 1891, Dvořák received an honorary degree from the University of Cambridge, and was offered a position at the Prague Conservatory as professor of composition and instrumentation. At first he refused the offer, but then later accepted; this change of mind was seemingly a result of a quarrel with his publisher Simrock over payment for his Eighth Symphony. Dvořák’s Requiem was premiered later that year in Birmingham at the Triennial Music Festival.
In 1891 the Bohemian String Quartet, later called the Czech Quartet, was founded, with Karel Hoffmann, first violin, Josef Suk, second violin, Oskar Nedbal, viola, and Otakar Berger, cello. It is said that Nedbal and Suk had been two of Dvořák’s “most promising” students at the Conservatory and took the initiative in founding the Quartet. As of 1891 Dvořák had written 11 string quartets, six of which had been premiered, and these were available as part of the repertory of the Quartet on tour, as were the two quartets of Smetana.
From 1892 to 1895, Dvořák was the director of the National Conservatory of Music in New York City. He began at a then-staggering $15,000 annual salary. Emanuel Rubin describes the Conservatory and Dvořák’s time there. The Conservatory had been founded by Jeannette Thurber, a wealthy and philanthropic woman, who made it open to women and black students as well as white men, which was unusual for the times. Dvořák’s original contract provided for three hours a day of work, including teaching and conducting, six days a week, with four months’ vacation each summer. The Panic of 1893, a severe economic depression, depleted the assets of the Thurber family and other patrons of the Conservatory. In 1894 Dvořák’s salary was cut to $8000 per year and moreover was paid only irregularly. The Conservatory was located at 126–128 East 17th Street, but was demolished in 1911 and replaced by what is today a high school.
Dvořák’s main goal in America was to discover “American Music” and engage in it, much as he had used Czech folk idioms within his music. Shortly after his arrival in America in 1892, Dvořák wrote a series of newspaper articles reflecting on the state of American music. He supported the concept that African-American and Native American music should be used as a foundation for the growth of American music. He felt that through the music of Native Americans and African-Americans, Americans would find their own national style of music. Here Dvořák met Harry Burleigh, who later became one of the earliest African-American composers. Burleigh introduced Dvořák to traditional American spirituals.
In the winter and spring of 1893, Dvořák was commissioned by the New York Philharmonic to write Symphony No.9, “From the New World”, which was premiered under the baton of Anton Seidl, to tumultuous applause. Clapham writes that “without question this was one of the greatest triumphs, and very possibly the greatest triumph of all that Dvořák experienced” in his life, and when the Symphony was published it was “seized on by conductors and orchestras” all over the world.
Two months before leaving for America, Dvořák had hired as secretary Josef Jan Kovařík, who had just finished violin studies at the Prague Conservatory and was about to return to his home in the United States. There he continued to serve as Dvořák’s secretary and lived with the Dvořák family. He had come from the Czech-speaking community of Spillville, Iowa, where his father Jan Josef Kovařík was a schoolmaster. Dvořák decided to spend the summer of 1893 in Spillville, along with all his family. While there he composed the String Quartet in F (the “American”) and the String Quintet in E-flat. Back in New York that autumn, he composed his Sonatina for violin and piano. He also conducted a performance of his Eighth Symphony at the Columbian Exposition in Chicago that same year.
In the winter of 1894–95, Dvořák wrote his Cello Concerto in B minor, Op. 104, B. 191, completed in February 1895. However, his partially unpaid salary, together with increasing recognition in Europe – he had been made an honorary member of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde in Vienna – and a remarkable amount of homesickness made him decide to return to Bohemia.
He informed Thurber that he was leaving. Dvořák and his wife left New York before the end of the spring term with no intention of returning.
Dvořák’s New York home was located at 327 East 17th Street, near the intersection of what is today called Perlman Place. It was in this house that both the B minor Cello Concerto and the New World Symphony were written within a few years. Despite protests, from Czech President Václav Havel amongst others, who wanted the house preserved as a historical site, it was demolished in 1991 to make room for a Beth Israel Medical Center residence for people with AIDS. To honor Dvořák, however, a statue of him was erected in nearby Stuyvesant Square.
Brahms continued to try to “clear a path for” Dvořák, “the only contemporary whom he considered really worthy”. While Dvořák was in America, Simrock was still publishing his music in Germany, and Brahms corrected proofs for him. Dvořák said it was hard to understand why Brahms would “take on the very tedious job of proofreading. I don’t believe there is another musician of his stature in the whole world who would do such a thing.”
Dvořák returned from the United States on 27 April 1895 with his wife and Otakar Berger, and took care to avoid spreading the news about his return. However, after a performance of Dimitrij at the National Theater on 19 May, Dvořák fled to the family country cottage in Vysoká. Dvořák’s first love and later sister-in-law, Josefina Kaunitzová, née Čermáková, died in May 1895. He and she had maintained friendly relations over the years. After her death he revised the coda of his Cello Concerto in her memory. During Dvořák’s final years, he concentrated on composing opera and chamber music. In November 1895, he resumed his professorship at the Prague Conservatory. Between 1895 and 1897, he completed his string quartets in A-flat major and G major, and also worked on the cycle of symphonic poems inspired by the collection Kytice by Karel Jaromír Erben. As seen in Burghauser’s 1960 Catalogue, Dvořák wrote his five Symphonic Poems in 1896, but after that completed few works per year, mainly operas: Jakobín in 1896, nothing in 1897, only The Devil and Kate in 1898–99, Rusalka in 1900, two songs and “Recitatives” in 1900/01, and finally the opera Armida in 1902–03. Rusalka became the most popular of all Dvořák’s ten operas and gained an international reputation (below under Works, Operas).
In 1896 he visited London for the last time to conduct the premiere of his Cello Concerto in B minor by the London Philharmonic. Also in 1896, Brahms tried to persuade Dvořák, who had several children, to move to Vienna. Brahms said he had no dependents and “If you need anything, my fortune is at your disposal”. Clapham writes “Dvořák was deeply moved and tears came to his wife’s eyes, but it was quite impossible for him, a Czech, to contemplate leaving Bohemia.” Brahms himself had little time left to live, as he died 3 April 1897. Also, Brahms hoped to gain an ally in Vienna to “counterbalance the influence of” Bruckner.
In 1897 Dvořák’s daughter Otilie married his student, the composer Josef Suk. In the same year, Dvořák visited Brahms on his deathbed and attended his funeral on 6 April 1897. In November Dvořák was appointed a member of the jury for the Viennese Artists’ Stipendium. He was informed in November 1898 that Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria-Hungary would award him a gold medal for Litteris et Artibus, the ceremony taking place before an audience in June 1899. On 4 April 1900 Dvořák conducted his last concert with the Czech Philharmonic, performing Brahms’ Tragic Overture, Schubert’s “Unfinished” Symphony, Beethoven’s 8th Symphony. and Dvořák’s own symphonic poem The Wild Dove. In April 1901, The Emperor appointed him a member of the Austro-Hungarian House of Lords, along with the leading Czech poet Jaroslav Vrchlický. Dvoŕák also succeeded Antonín Bennewitz as director of the Prague Conservatory from November 1901 until his death. Dvořák’s 60th birthday was celebrated as a national event. First, around the actual date, six of his operas and the oratorio St. Ludmila were performed in Prague, but Dvořák was away in Vienna; then in November 1901 came the “postponed official birthday party… In many towns all over Bohemia and Moravia, the Czech people celebrated his birthday.”
On 25 March 1904 Dvořák had to leave a rehearsal of Armida because of illness. The first Czech Musical Festival, in April 1904, had “a programme consisting almost entirely” of Dvořák’s music (Leoš Janáček was disappointed that none of his music was performed.) “Seventy-six choral associations” from all over Bohemia gathered in Prague, and “sixteen thousand singers” sang Dvořák’s oratorio Saint Ludmila. “Thousands of listeners celebrated” the symphony “From the New World”. Dvořák himself was forced by illness to “take to his bed” and so was unable to attend.
Dvořák had an “attack of influenza” on 18 April and died on 1 May 1904, of an undiagnosed cause following five weeks of illness, at the age of 62, leaving many unfinished works. His funeral service was held on 5 May, and his ashes were interred in the Vyšehrad cemetery in Prague, beneath a bust by Czech sculptor Ladislav Šaloun.
Many of Dvořák’s compositions, such as the Slavonic Dances and his large collection of songs, were directly inspired by Czech, Moravian, and other Slavic traditional music. As the basis for his works, Dvořák frequently used Slavic folk dance forms including the skočná; the Bohemian odzemek, furiant, sousedská, and špacirka; the Polish mazurka and polonaise; the Yugoslav Kolo; and folk song forms of Slavic peoples, including the Ukrainian dumka. His 16 Slavonic Dances, Op. 46, which first brought him a wide reputation, and Op. 72, include at least one of each of these forms. He also wrote an orchestral Polonaise (1879). He named the third movement of his 6th Symphony as “Scherzo (Furiant)”. His Dumky Trio is one of his best-known chamber works, and is named for the Dumka, a traditional Slavic and Polish genre. His major works reflect his heritage and love for his native land. Dvořák followed in the footsteps of Bedřich Smetana, the creator of the modern Czech musical style.
Dvořák had been an admirer of Wagner’s music since 1857. Late in life, he said that Wagner “was so great a genius that he was capable of doing things that were beyond the reach of other composers”. Wagner especially influenced Dvořák’s operas, but also some orchestral pieces. According to Clapham, the theme of the Andante Sostenuto from his fourth symphony “could almost have come directly out of Tannhäuser“.
From 1873 on, Dvořák’s style was “moving steadily in the direction of classical models”. To be more specific about “classical models”, in 1894 Dvořák wrote an article in which he said the composers of the past he admired most were Bach, Mozart, Beethoven and Schubert. As the article was specifically on Schubert, three years in advance of the centennial of Schubert’s birth, it seems Dvořák had a special predilection toward Schubert.
Dvořák wrote in a variety of forms: his nine symphonies generally stick to classical models, but he also worked in the newly developed form of symphonic poem. Many of his works show the influence of Czech folk music, both in terms of elements such as rhythms and melodic shapes; amongst these are the two sets of Slavonic Dances, the Symphonic Variations, and the overwhelming majority of his songs, but echoes of such influence are also found in his major choral works. Dvořák also wrote operas (of which the best known is Rusalka); serenades for string orchestra and wind ensemble; chamber music (including a number of string quartets and quintets); and piano music.
While a large number of Dvořák’s works were given opus numbers, these did not always bear a logical relationship to the order in which they were either written or published. To achieve better sales, some publishers such as N. Simrock preferred to present budding composers as being well established, by giving some relatively early works much higher opus numbers than their chronological order would merit. In other cases, Dvořák deliberately provided new works with lower opus numbers to be able to sell them outside contract obligations to other publishers. An example is the Czech Suite which Dvořák didn’t want to sell to Simrock, and had published with Schlesinger as Op. 39 instead of Op. 52. In this way it could come about that the same opus number was given to more than one of Dvořák’s works; for example the opus number 12, which was assigned, successively, to: the opera King and Charcoal Burner (1871), the Concert Overture in F (1871, derived from the opera), the String Quartet No. 6 in A minor (1873), the Furiant in G minor for piano (1879), and the Dumka in C minor for piano (1884). In yet other cases, a work was given as many as three different opus numbers by different publishers.
The sequential numbering of his symphonies has also been confused: (a) they were initially numbered by order of publication, not composition; (b) the first four symphonies to be composed were published after the last five; and (c) the last five symphonies were not published in order of composition. This explains why, for example, the New World Symphony was originally published as No. 5, was later known as No. 8, and definitively renumbered as No. 9 in the critical editions published in the 1950s.
All of Dvořák’s works were chronologically catalogued by Jarmil Burghauser. As an example, in the Burghauser catalogue, the New World Symphony, Op. 95, is B.178. Scholars today often refer to Dvořák’s works by their B numbers (for Burghauser), partly because many early works do not have opus numbers. References to the traditional opus numbers are still common, in part because the opus numbers have historical continuity with earlier scores and printed programs. The opus numbers are still more likely to appear in printed programs for performances.
During Dvořák’s life, only five of his symphonies were widely known. The first published was his sixth, dedicated to Hans Richter. After Dvořák’s death, research uncovered four unpublished symphonies, of which the manuscript of the first had even been lost to the composer himself. This led to an unclear situation in which the New World Symphony has alternately been called the 5th, 8th and 9th. This article uses the modern numbering system, according to the order in which the symphonies were written.
With their broadly lyrical style and accessibility to the listener, Dvořák’s symphonies seem to derive from the Schubertian tradition; but, as Taruskin suggests, the great difference was Dvořák’s use of “cyclic” form, especially in his later symphonies (and indeed concertos), whereby he “occasionally recycled themes from movement to movement to a degree which lent his works a tinge of secret ‘programmaticism'”.
Symphony No. 1 in C minor, Op. 3, was written in 1865 when Dvořák was 24 years old. was later subtitled The Bells of Zlonice, referring to the time Dvořák from ages 13 to 16 had spent in the village of Zlonice and in the church there. Like the Symphony No. 2 in B-flat major, Op. 4, also in 1865, it is, despite touches of originality, too wayward to maintain a place in the standard symphonic repertory.
Symphony No. 3 in E-flat major, Op. 10 (c. 1873), shows the impact of Dvořák’s recent acquaintance with the music of Richard Wagner. This influence is less evident in Symphony No. 4 in D minor, Op. 13, except for the start of the second movement.
Symphony No. 5 in F major, Op. 76, and Symphony No. 6 in D major, Op. 60, are largely pastoral in nature. The Sixth, published in 1880, shows a resemblance to the Symphony No. 2 of Brahms, particularly in the outer movements, but not so much in the third-movement furiant, a vivid Czech dance. This was the symphony that made Dvořák internationally known as a symphonic composer.
Symphony No. 7 in D minor of 1885, Op. 70,.
Symphony No. 8 in G major, Op. 88, is characterized by a warmer and more optimistic tone. Karl Schumann (in booklet notes for a recording of all the symphonies by Rafael Kubelík) compares it to the works of Gustav Mahler.
Symphony No. 9 in E minor, Op. 95, is also known by its subtitle, From the New World, or as the New World Symphony. Dvořák wrote it between January and May 1893, while he was in New York. At the time of its first performance, he claimed that he used elements from American music such as spirituals and Native American music in this work, but he later denied this. Reacting to American racism, he wrote in an article published in the New York Herald on 15 December 1893, “[In the 9th symphony] I have simply written original themes embodying the peculiarities of the Indian music.” Neil Armstrong took a recording of the New World Symphony to the Moon during the Apollo 11 mission, the first Moon landing, in 1969, and in 2009 it was voted the favourite symphony in a poll run by ABC Classic FM in Australia.
Many conductors have recorded cycles of the symphonies, including Karel Ančerl, István Kertész, Rafael Kubelík, Otmar Suitner, Libor Pešek, Zdeněk Mácal, Václav Neumann, Witold Rowicki, and Neeme Järvi.
Adolf Čech premiered more of Dvořák’s symphonies than anyone else. He conducted the first performances of Nos. 2, 5 and 6; the composer premiered Nos. 7 and 8; Bedřich Smetana led Nos. 3 and 4; Anton Seidl conducted No. 9; and Milan Sachs premiered No. 1.
Franz Liszt had invented the form Symphonic Poem, a relatively new one, never adopted by more “conservative” Romantic composers such as Brahms. Dvořák wrote five symphonic poems, all in 1896–1897, and they have sequential opus numbers: The Water Goblin, Op. 107; The Noon Witch, Op. 108; The Golden Spinning Wheel, Op. 109; The Wild Dove, Op. 110; and A Hero’s Song, Op. 111. The first four of these works are based upon ballads from the collection Kytice by the Czech folklorist Karel Jaromír Erben. A Hero’s Song is based on a program of Dvořák’s devising and is believed to be autobiographical.
To Dvořák’s main choral works belong his setting of Stabat Mater (the longest extant setting of that work), his Requiem, his setting of the Te Deum and his Mass in D major.
The Stabat Mater, Op. 58, is an extensive (c. 90 minutes) vocal-instrumental sacred work for soli (soprano, alto, tenor and bass), choir and orchestra based on the text of an old church hymn with the same name. The first inspiration for creating this piece was the death of the composer’s daughter, Josefa.
Antonín Dvořák composed his Requiem in 1890, at the beginning of the peak period of his career. Dvořák was a deeply religious man, and this work reflects his faith and spirituality. The premiere of the work took place on 9 October 1891 in Birmingham, conducted by Dvořák himself, and was “very successful”. It had an outstanding success in Boston 30 November 1892: “the composer was frequently applauded between numbers and given a most enthusiastic ovation at the end.”. In Vienna it was greeted, belatedly, in 1901: “The Vienna performance in March 1901 was a triumph of Dvořák’s music, as if the Viennese public wished thereby to make up for their earlier, sometimes cool reception of his works.”
The Te Deum, Op. 103, is a cantata for soprano and baritone solo, choir and orchestra to the Latin text of the famous hymn Te Deum (God, we laud You). It was composed in 1892 and dedicated to the 400th anniversary of the discovery of America. The composition had been completed before Dvořák moved to America and was commissioned by Jeanette Thurber in 1891, when the composer accepted a position as director of her school. The composition, which is on a more intimate scale than the Stabat Mater and Requiem, was premiered at Dvořák’s first concert in New York on 21 October 1892.
The Mass in D major (originally numbered as Op. 76, finally as Op. 86) was originally intended for organ, solo voices and small choir. The work was given its final shape in the year 1892 when, in response to a request from the Novello publishers of London, Dvořák arranged his Mass for a symphony orchestra.
The oratorio Saint Ludmila was a huge success in Bohemia and Moravia, sung at events in Dvořák’s honor in 1901 and 1904. Its text, in Czech, may have limited its audience among non-Czech speakers. The piece had a considerable success in England in October 1886, with an audience on the 15th “in raptures… the critics praised the music in the warmest terms”, and on the 29th, there was a “large and equally enthusiastic audience, and once again the critics were full of praise”, but a drawback was that the libretto, specifically its translation into English, was “regarded on all sides as unsatisfactory”.
The cantata The Spectre’s Bride, Op. 69, B. 135, performed in 1885 at the Birmingham, England, Musical Festival, was the greatest success in Dvořák’s career up to that point.
The critic Harold C. Schonberg wrote that Dvořák wrote “an attractive Piano Concerto in G minor with a rather ineffective piano part, a beautiful Violin Concerto in A minor, and a supreme Cello Concerto in B minor”. All the concerti are in the classical three-movement form.
The Concerto for Piano and Orchestra in G minor, Op. 33 was the first of three concerti (for solo instrument and orchestra) that Dvořák composed, and it is perhaps the least known of the three.
The Concerto for Violin and Orchestra in A minor, Op. 53 was written in 1878 for the great violinist Joseph Joachim, whom Dvořák had met and admired. He finished it in 1879, but Joachim was skeptical of the work. The concerto was premiered in 1883 in Prague by the violinist František Ondříček, who also gave its first performances in Vienna and London.
The Concerto for Cello and Orchestra in B minor, Op. 104 was the last composed of Dvořák’s concerti. He wrote it in 1894–1895 for his friend the cellist Hanuš Wihan. Wihan and others had asked for a cello concerto for some time, but Dvořák refused, stating that the cello was a fine orchestral instrument but completely insufficient for a solo concerto. Dvořák composed the concerto in New York while serving as the Director of the National Conservatory. In 1894 Victor Herbert, who was also teaching at the Conservatory, had written a cello concerto and presented it in a series of concerts. Dvořák attended at least two performances of Victor Herbert’s cello concerto and was inspired to fulfill Wihan’s request for a cello concerto. Dvořák’s concerto received its premiere in London on 16 March 1896, with the English cellist Leo Stern. The reception was “enthusiastic”. Brahms said of the work: “Had I known that one could write a cello concerto like this, I would have written one long ago!” Agreeing with Schonberg, the cellist and author Robert Battey wrote “I believe it to be the greatest of all cello concertos…an opinion shared by most cellists”. A compiler of discographies of Dvořák’s music wrote that his is the “king” of cello concertos.
In 1865, early in his career, Dvořák had composed a Violoncello concerto in A major with Piano accompaniment, B. 10. Günter Raphael in 1925–1929 produced a revised and orchestrated version. Dvořák’s cataloguer Jarmil Burghauser made another orchestration and abridgement, published in 1975.
Over a period of almost 30 years, Dvořák’s output of chamber music was prolific and diverse, including more than 40 works for ensembles with strings.
In 1860 just after he finished his education at the Organ school, Dvořák composed his String Quintet No. 1 in A minor, Op. 1. Two more would follow, of which the String Quintet No. 2 in G major, Op. 77 from early 1875, is noteworthy for the use of a double bass. It was written for a chamber music competition sponsored by the Umělecká beseda (Artistic Circle), where it was unanimously awarded the prize of five ducats for the “distinction of theme, the technical skill in polyphonic composition, the mastery of form and the knowledge of the instruments” displayed. The String Quintet No.3 in E♭ major, Op. 97, with a second viola added, was written near the end of his output for chamber ensemble during his American period in 1893, when he spent a summer holiday in Spillville, Iowa.
Within a year after completing his first string quintet, Dvořák completed his String Quartet No. 1 in A major, Op. 2, the first of his fourteen string quartets. For some time Dvořák was very tentative in his approach to quartets. In the 1880s Dvořák made a list of compositions he had destroyed, which lists two quartets and 2 other quartets. He may well have destroyed the scores, but only after the individual instrumental parts had been copied out. The number of errors in the parts makes it highly unlikely that he actually had them played. The quartets numbered 2 to 4 were probably composed between 1868 and 1870 and show the strong influence of the music of Richard Wagner. Dvořák kept the manuscripts of these quartets but did not give them opus numbers. They have numbers B.17, B.18, and B.19 in the Burghauser catalog. An Andante religioso from his fourth quartet was used five years later in his second string quintet Op. 77, as a second movement named Intermezzo: Nocturne, making this initially a five-movement composition, although he later withdrew this second movement, and later still reworked it variously, resulting in the Nocturne for Strings in B major, Op. 40 (B. 47). The two Quartets he wrote in 1873 (number 5, B37 and number 6, B40) show a stronger sense of form.
His most popular quartet is his twelfth, the American, Op. 96. He also composed two piano quintets, both in A major, of which the second, Op. 81, is the better known. He left a Terzetto for two violins and viola (Op. 74); two piano quartets, a string sextet; Op. 48; and four piano trios, including the Piano Trio No. 4 (subtitled Dumky), Op. 90. He also wrote a set of Bagatelles, Op. 47, for the unusual instrumentation of two violins, cello, and harmonium, two waltzes for string quartet, and a set of twelve love songs arranged for quartet, taken from his set of 18 songs originally composed in 1865 entitled Cypresses.
In a 1904 interview, Dvořák claimed that opera was ‘the most suitable form for the nation’. If this nationalist sentiment was at the heart of his opera compositions, he also struggled to find a style straddling Czech traditional melody and the grand opera style of Giacomo Meyerbeer, which he experienced as lead viola player in the orchestra of Prague’s Provisional Theatre between 1862 and 1871, and whose influence is very evident in his works such as Vanda and Dimitrij. His later interest in the music of Richard Wagner also affected his operas, evident in the very extensive rewrite of Dmitrij in 1894, following its failure at Vienna.
Of all his operas, only Rusalka, Op. 114, which contains the well-known aria “Měsíčku na nebi hlubokém” (“Song to the Moon”), is played on contemporary opera stages with any frequency outside the Czech Republic. This is attributable to their uneven invention and libretti, and perhaps also their staging requirements – The Jacobin, Armida, Vanda and Dimitrij need stages large enough to portray invading armies.
There is speculation by Dvořák scholars such as Michael Beckerman that portions of his Symphony No. 9 “From the New World”, notably the second movement, were adapted from studies for a never-written opera about Hiawatha.
The song cycle of 10 Biblical Songs, Op. 99, B. 185, was written in March 1894. Around that time Dvořák was informed of the death of the famous conductor, and his close personal friend, Hans von Bülow. Just a month earlier, he had been grieved to hear that his father was near death, far away in Bohemia. Dvořák consoled himself in the Psalms. The resulting work, considered the finest of his song cycles, is based on the text of the Czech Bible of Kralice. As fate would have it, his father expired 28 March 1894, two days after the completion of the work.
Another well known cycle is the seven Gypsy Songs (Czech Cikánské melodie) B. 104, Op. 55 which includes “Songs My Mother Taught Me” (the fourth of the set).
Dvořák created many other songs inspired by Czech national traditional music, such as the “Love Songs”, “Evening Songs”, etc.
From other important works, that show also the influence of Czech folk music, both in terms of rhythms and of melodic shapes, perhaps the best known examples are the two sets of Slavonic Dances, written in two series. The first book, Op. 46 (1878), is predominantly Czech in respect to the forms represented. They were created for piano duet (one piano, four hands), but Dvořák proceeded to orchestrate the entire set, completing that version the same year. The second book, Op. 72 (also composed originally for piano four hands), which came along eight years later, includes forms native to such other Slavic lands as Serbia, Poland and Ukraine, although some “merge characteristics of more than one dance”. Dvořák did not use actual folk tunes in his dances, but created his own themes in the authentic style of traditional folk music, using only rhythms of original folk dances.
A work that does not fit into any of the above categories is the Symphonic Variations of 1877. Orchestral variations on an original theme, composed as a freestanding work, were a rather unusual genre. Originally unsuccessful and revived only after ten years, it has since established itself in the repertoire.
1980 film Concert at the End of Summer is based on Dvořák’s life. Dvořák was played by Josef Vinklář. 2012 television film The American Letters focuses on Dvořák’s love life. Dvořák is played by Hynek Čermák.
«Де́ло Новодво́рской» — уголовное дело по факту публикации антирусских статей в газете «Новый Взгляд» . Это было вторым уголовным делом против журналиста в России. Первым обвинённым журналистом был Слава Могутин: уголовное дело было возбуждено в 1993 году Пресненской прокуратурой после того, как та же газета «Новый Взгляд» опубликовала его интервью с танцором Борисом Моисеевым.
19 марта 1994 года Краснопресненская прокуратура начала проверку деятельности Валерии Новодворской по статьям 71 и 74 УК РСФСР («Пропаганда гражданской войны» и «Разжигание межнациональной розни»).
Публикации привели к тому, что 27 января 1995 года генеральной прокуратурой РФ было возбуждено уголовное дело (N229120) по признакам составов преступлений, предусмотренных ст.71 ч.1 ст.74 УК РСФСР .
Поводом к возбуждению дела согласно официальному письму стали выступления автора в газете «Новый Взгляд». Указывалось, что в статье «Не отдадим наше право налево» (за номером 119 от 28 августа 1993 года) Новодворская «умышлено унижала национальную честь и достоинство русского населения Латвии и Эстонии», пропагандировала идею о неполноценности по национальному признаку печатно утверждая, что русских «нельзя с правами пускать в европейскую цивилизацию. Их положили у параши и правильно сделали».
В статье «Россия N 6» , опубликованной в номере 1 от 15 января 1994 года, ею, В. И. Новодворской, умышленно унижается достоинство русских путём утверждения «о маниакально-депрессивном психозе», как неотъемлемой черте русского характера, определяющей всю историю народа. Во всех материалах, подготовленных и подписанных Новодворской phone holder when running, опираясь на тенденциозно подобранные факты и измышления об образе жизни, исторической роли, культуре, нравах и обычаях лиц русской национальности, путём необоснованных выводов и ложных логических посылок, умышленно воздействовала на познавательный компонент социальных установок широкой аудитории, и, на этой основе, влияя на её эмоционально-оценочные отношения к проблемам межнациональных отношений, формировала негативное отношение к гражданам русской нации и её представителям, пропагандируя их неполноценность по признаку отношения к национальной принадлежности, унижая их национальные честь и достоинство, целенаправленно возбуждая межнациональную вражду и рознь, способствуя ухудшению межнациональных отношений на внутри- и межгосударственных уровнях.
Таким образом Новодворская — с позиций обвинения — совершила преступление, предусмотренное ч.1 ст.74 УК РСФСР.
09 апреля 1996 года вынесено постановление о прекращении уголовного дела в части, касающейся ст.71 УК РСФСР.
Привлечённая и допрошенная Новодворская свою вину не признала и «показала, что Уголовный Кодекс не предусматривает ответственности за критическое отношение к политическому, моральному и культурному состоянию собственного народа». Тем более, как подчеркнула колумнист «Нового Взгляда» Новодворская, закон не запрещает критически анализировать собственную историю.
Смягчающих и отягчающих вину Новодворской обстоятельств указанных в ст.38 и ст.39 УК РСФСР, соответственно, — нет. На основании изложенного, Валерия Ильинична Новодворская, 17 мая 1950 года рождения, русская, уроженка города Барановичи, Брестской области, Белорусской ССР, образование высшее, не замужем, помощник депутата Борового, журналист, эксперт партии Экономической Свободы, прописана по адресу: <…> обвиняется в том, что она совершила умышленные действия, направленные на возбуждение национальной вражды и розни, пропаганду неполноценности граждан по признаку отношения к национальной принадлежности.
В соответствии с правовыми нормами (ст.207 УПК РСФСР) материалы «дела Новодворской» были направлены прокурору города Москвы. Однако 8 августа 1995 года прокуратурой Центрального округа Москвы дело было закрыто.
Редакция прекратила сотрудничество с радикальной журналисткой, поскольку её чрезмерно экстравагантые заявления и позиция по так называемому «чеченскому вопросу» не вызывали взаимопонимания у членов редколлегии, хотя сама Новодворская (на страницах «Собеседника») намекала на вмешательства спецслужб. В интервью британскому телеканалу «BBC One» главный редактор газеты Евгений Ю. Додолев прокомментировал аннулирование контракта с экстремальным колумнистом лаконично: «Это больше не смешно» (англ.  italy football shirt;It’s not funny anymore. Not at all). И добавил, что публикации Лимонова и Проханова в «Новом Взгляде» не могут сбалансировать «радикально-либеральный элемент».
По итогам расследования прокуратура предъявила Новодворской обвинение по ст. 74 ч. 1 УК России (действия, направленные на умышленное возбуждение национальной вражды или розни, на унижение национальной чести и достоинства). Основание — экспертные заключения Института психологии Российской академии наук. В них делался однозначный вывод о том, что суждения Новодворской, содержащиеся в представленных материалах, разжигают межнациональную рознь и унижают национальное достоинство. Однако адвокат лидера ДС Генри Резник с этим не был согласен :
Он считает, что в действиях Новодворской «нет прямого умысла на совершение преступления». По мнению адвоката, Новодворская в своих статьях лишь высказывала своё мнение по поводу тех отрицательных качеств русского человека, о которых до неё заявляли Петр Чаадаев, Николай Гоголь, Александр Пушкин и Владимир Ульянов (Ленин). Кроме того, Резник считает, что следователь прокуратуры, назначая экспертизы, необоснованно предложил специалистам оценить тексты Новодворской целиком, вместо того чтобы попросить их проанализировать её конкретные высказывания. Таким образом, утверждает адвокат, эксперты, а не следователи выискивали в публикациях Новодворской состав преступления. Это, по мнению Резника, противоречит УПК России. В самом же постановлении о возбуждении уголовного дела не содержится конкретных высказываний Новодворской, а лишь выводы экспертов и общие фразы.
Обратив внимание на указанные огрехи, адвокат заявил ходатайство о прекращении дела.
Из заявления Русского ПЕН-центра :
Согласно Хартии Международного ПЕН-клуба, писатель или журналист, который в своих произведениях призывает к войне и разжигает межнациональную рознь, не может рассчитывать на защиту Международного ПЕН-клуба, если он привлекается за это к уголовной ответственности. Однако, именно потому что Русский ПЕН-центр не усматривает в художественных произведениях Новодворской выдвинутых обвинений, и более того, убежден в том, что дело Новодворской сфабриковано с целью дискредитации одного из основных прав человека на свободу слова и творчества, Русский ПЕН-центр считает своим долгом выступить в защиту Валерии Новодворской. Во всех своих материалах Валерия Ильинична Новодворская предстает перед нами как яркий талантливый художник с явно обостренным гиперболизированным чувством боли и страданий за народ, частью которого она себя ощущает. Все претензии к ней, связанные якобы с оскорблением русских, России, Родины, абсолютно необоснованны. Обвинители забывают о праве на свободную критику. Считаем необходимым напомнить слова Виссариона Белинского о том, что «тот, кто любит свою Родину, тот особенно ненавидит её недостатки». Мы не будем вдаваться в подробности тех литературных форм и приемов, которыми так блистательно владеет Валерия Новодворская, но мы хотим сказать о том, что процесс над Новодворской из процесса над художественным словом в мгновение ока превратился в политический процесс. Мы считаем, что дело Новодворской — очередной пробный камень в попытке наступления национал-большевизма и коммунистов на интеллигенцию, которая не может представить себя без права на самовыражение. Методы фабрикации дела Валерии Новодворской заставляют нас вспомнить политические процессы недавнего тоталитарного прошлого, инспирировавшиеся тайной полицией 5-го идеологического отдела КГБ.
Из обращения, направленного Координационным Совещанием правозащитных организаций в честь 20-летия Московской Хельсинкской группы в адрес Председателя Верховного Совета Республики Беларусь :
Обвинение поражает своей абсурдностью: в качестве пропагандистских материалов, преследующих цель посеять межнациональную вражду, фигурируют не листовки или плакаты ДСР, а статьи Новодворской, написанные в жанре художественно-публицистического эссе. Уголовно наказуемой становится литературная форма: сарказм, гротеск, стилистические фигуры, образность. Подсудными оказываются критические суждения о чертах русского национального характера, высказывавшиеся дотоле лучшими сынами России… Валерия Новодворская — убежденный антикоммунист и антифашист. Неприятие этих форм тоталитарной идеологии и практики она выражает во всех своих, в том числе и инкриминируемых ей статьях. В свете этих обстоятельств привлечение Новодворской к уголовной ответственности не может быть расценено иначе как преследование по политическим мотивам. Свобода мысли и слова — фундаментальное право человека, главное завоевание демократических перемен в жизни России. Посягательство на него — тягчайшее нарушение Конституции Российской Федерации и общепризнанных международно-правовых норм.
Обвиняемая выпустила книгу «Прощание славянки» (ISBN 978-5-8159-0893-2) куда и вошли: публикации из газеты «Новый Взгляд», материалы дела и речи .